Home / Freelivecamsfree viedochat online / Mt st helens radioactive dating

Mt st helens radioactive dating

What radiometric dating does is give geologists discrete ages to assign to many events in Earth’s long history, something that would be impossible to do using other techniques. HEBERT’S ARGUMENTS For those of you who do not want to wade through this entire article, here’s a summary: Dr.Hebert mentioned a few commonly-used YEC examples of radiometric dates which do not conform to reasonable old-Earth interpretations. The resultant dates for mineral and whole-rock samples ranged from 0.34 to 2.8 million years old, even though the dacite was a product of an eruption that occurred in 1986.Most scientists who investigated Earth history in the late 1700s and early 1800s came to the conclusion that Earth must be far older than just a few thousand years.This was long before the discovery of radioactivity in the 1890s or the development of radiometric dating techniques in the 1900s.If radiometric dating works—and I believe it reveals accurate dates most of the time—Christians should not be intimidated.Geologists have known for a long time that the isotope geochemistry of Earth is complex, and that radiometric dating does not always return what is considered to be a geologically-valid result, but there is no reason for old-Earth Christians to be intimidated by discrepant dates.

mt st helens radioactive dating-42mt st helens radioactive dating-38

A good critique of the RATE helium diffusion dates is given at Helium Diffusion in Zircon: Flaws in a Young-Earth Argument, Part 1 (of 2).

I could write a rather lengthy article in response, but I will try to keep things brief. Hebert’s closing declaration: This is a true statement.

All truth is God’s truth, including the truths revealed in the creation.

All of this biased the results in favor of a younger Earth. Hebert stated that radiocarbon dating assumes the same ratio of carbon-14 (radiocarbon) in the atmosphere for thousands of years.

I was really surprised that he said this; perhaps my notes are wrong.

222 comments

  1. Well over forty different radiometric dating methods are in use, and a number of non-radiogenic methods not even mentioned here. Claim A young-Earth research group reported that they sent a rock erupted in 1980 from Mount Saint Helens volcano to a dating lab and got back a potassium-argon age of several million.

  2. The lava dome at Mount St. Helens provides a rare opportunity for putting radioisotope dating to the test. 1980's Lava Dome, high atop Mount St. Helens, in Washington State, USA. In August of 1993, I had the exciting privilege of accompanying geologist Dr. Steven Austin and others from the Institute for Creation Research.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*