This date did not fit the preconceived notion that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. They do this many times, using a different dating method each time.The results can be as much as 150 million years different from each other! They then pick the date they like best, based upon their preconceived notion of how old their theory says the fossil should be .g., a shipwreck and giving misleading dates must be considered.) Organic samples which are not derived from the same part of an organism, may show dating variations which blur and obscure the interpretation being attempted.If compelling archaeological reasons for supposing that the ages come from exactly contemporary samples do not exist, then results must be regarded as suspect.The old wood effect or old wood problem is a pitfall encountered in the archaeological technique of radiocarbon dating.A sample will provide misleading or confusing results if materials of different ages are deposited in the same context.
The age they came back with was only a few thousand years old. And kept their theory that dinosaurs lived "millions of years ago" instead. They then use potassium argon, or other methods, and date the fossils again.
When a number of objects are recovered from one deposit, the terminus post quem is based on the dating from the 'youngest' find.
Even though other items in the same stratum indicate earlier dates, they may have been deposited at the same time.
The samples of bone were blind samples.""Of course carbon dating isn't going to work on your Allosaurus bone. So I would expect to get some weird number like 16,000 years if you carbon date a millions of years old fossil.
16.000 years by the way is still 10,000 years before your God supposedly created the Earth." Amy M 12/11/01 My response: I explain the limits of Carbon dating below.